From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 15 16:32:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA06431 for current-outgoing; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 16:32:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA06422 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 16:32:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.3/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id QAA04855; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 16:32:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 16:32:42 -0800 (PST) From: invalid opcode To: Satoshi Asami cc: pst@Shockwave.COM, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin In-Reply-To: <199602152221.OAA03676@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > The manpages are in /usr/local/man for historical reasons. We've been > shipping an /etc/manpath.config with "/usr/local/man" for ages and it > will be too much of a pain to change it now. Also, virtually no > third-party software installs man pages in /usr/local/share/man, which > means we have to go patch the 400+ ports. > Once again, we compromise consistency for "historical reasons." Chris Layne, coredump@nervosa.com.