From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 16:15:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 96C1916A469; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:00 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20071214161500.GA64820@FreeBSD.org> References: <200712122021.lBCKLdvt045540@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071213223319.E81630@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071213223319.E81630@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Kip Macy , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/netinet tcp_ofld.c tcp_ofld.h tcp_var.h toedev.h src/sys/sys socket.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:15:00 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:44:33PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > 1.1 +126 -0 src/sys/netinet/tcp_ofld.c (new) > > 1.1 +198 -0 src/sys/netinet/tcp_ofld.h (new) > > I consider that just for the archives .. > > .. but is there a reason you abbreviated those file names like that? > It's not like we live with 8.3 contrainsts. > > The first time I parsed it as "of ld", then realiazed it should be > "off ld" and then wondered why it wasn't just "offload" like it is > "syncache" or "timewait" or "hostcache"? > > And yes, I wondered the same about the functions names, ... > > Was that spelling inherited from another implementation/standard/whatever? +1. If there are no special heritage behind these names, I would also like to see them expanded. Thanks. ./danfe