From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 10 09:03:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B33B16A402; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670F743D45; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 775A8B833; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:03:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 99238 invoked by uid 1002); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:03:21 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:03:21 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov To: Sam Lawrance Message-ID: <20060410090321.GA99198@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <44373C39.20903@FreeBSD.org> <20060410.151635.21931503.hrs@allbsd.org> <56F2BA34-0F86-428B-9355-04B31F97061A@brooknet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F2BA34-0F86-428B-9355-04B31F97061A@brooknet.com.au> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Jeremy Messenger , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Hiroki Sato , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports LEGAL MOVED UPDATING ports/www Makefile CVSROOT modules ports/www/linux-flashplugin Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin7 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:03:23 -0000 On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:56:03PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote: > > > >I am using FreeBSD ports tree on Linux. > > Sounds terribly dodgy. It does not matter. It's just an 'example' to show that the ports tree is not necessary tied with FreeBSD in a means of a underlying OS. I could be using the ports tree under DOS, Windows, irix and hpux :-o -- Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra