From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 21 15:28:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 87BC616A4CE; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:28:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F54443D1D; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:28:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i1LNSBSQ010509;
	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:28:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:28:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200402210253.i1L2r6rR035857@green.homeunix.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402211822020.7870-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Testers wanted: reentrant resolver 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 23:28:12 -0000

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Brian F. Feldman wrote:

> Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Could you take a look at my test program (that I put in src/tools/) to see 
> > > if I made any pthreading errors?
> > 
> > Where in src/tools?
> 
> It's in src/tools/regression/gaithrstress.

Yes, it looks fine to me.

One other thing about your patch, probably minor.  Since h_error
is only used for the main thread now, multithreaded applications
that haven't been recompiled will still be referencing it
instead of the new function.  This would seem to break the ABI,
right?  These older applications will pick up the wrong h_error.

-- 
Dan Eischen