From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 15:40:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A05916A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:40:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B35643D45 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:40:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i24Ne1rQ053355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:40:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24NdsQn020866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:39:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24Ndsc5090277; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:39:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24Ndsx2090276; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:39:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:39:54 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <20040304233953.GQ84478@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200403041843.58272.h@schmalzbauer.de> <20040304112833.C21028@carver.gumbysoft.com> <200403042109.50537.h@schmalzbauer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200403042109.50537.h@schmalzbauer.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Mouseprotocol? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 23:40:11 -0000 On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:09:50PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 4. März 2004 20:29 schrieb Doug White: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Here's what I get from devfs: > > > port 1 addr 2: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Microsoft IntelliMouse® > > > Explorer(0x0095), Microsoft(0x045e), rev 4.19 > > > > > > And here is the line with my old Intellimouse Explorer (which worked > > > perfectly for four years now!): > > > port 2 addr 4: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Microsoft IntelliMouse® > > > Explorer(0x001e), Microsoft(0x045e), rev 1.14 > > > > Looks like the device ID just changed. usbdevs will need to be updated, > > thats all. > > > > Is the ums device attaching this mouse? > > Yes, after pluging in dmesg shows: > > ums1: Microsoft Microsoft IntelliMouse® Explorer, rev 2.00/4.19, addr 5, > iclass 3/1 > ums1: 5 buttons > > In fact it's a 9 button mouse. ums supports up to 7 buttons, if I got it right then the shown numer comes by scanning the hid descriptor table and should reflect what the device says. The other point looks in fact very much like a problem with XFree and the mouse. What does moused say about it? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de