From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug  6 22:25:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA13857
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA13850;
          Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tom@localhost) by misery.sdf.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA06164; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 22:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To: "M.R.Murphy" <mrm@Mole.ORG>
cc: julian@whistle.com, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        julian@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: I have 2 patches
In-Reply-To: <199608070425.VAA27899@meerkat.mole.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960806223519.5989A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, M.R.Murphy wrote:

> I'll also add that initially it looks like all of the functionality can
> be achieved with TIS FWTK without changing inetd or ftpd. And more :-)

  FWTK can not be used on "revenue generating" systems without a
commercial licence.  "revenue generating" is very broad, and covers most
installations.

  Julian's changes (as well as xinetd of course!) would not be so
restricted.

Tom