From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Sep 29 20:11:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A87037B502 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 20:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA23158; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:11:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.11.0/8.8.3) with ESMTP id e8U3CEG24409; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:12:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009300312.e8U3CEG24409@billy-club.village.org> To: MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro Subject: Re: [pcic irq] May I change default pcic mode into polling? Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:01:07 +0900." <200009300201.e8U218r00518@lavender.sanpei.org> References: <200009300201.e8U218r00518@lavender.sanpei.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:12:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200009300201.e8U218r00518@lavender.sanpei.org> MIHIRA Sanpei Yoshiro writes: : I used polling mode from July, and there is no problem. May I : commit same changes into 4-stable(RELENG_4) tree? : : Any comments? This looks ok. I think that the stylistic "no irq" is just to omit it from the config line. On the other hand, irq 0 does make it clear you are specifying an IRQ and that IRQ isn't used. So yes, go for it. It is a good change. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message