From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:49:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFF8106564A for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D208FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so5876063gxk.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JcWO81njN72U7yRbimW6UCwEaRV2iOlEhTt2M3e5pFk=; b=RlPSMgRzDbIBf2At7FBIfzE4qmOHn8iiHmnT0kCGKmoVFMep+LSoEYkDhG6Cn9koFi KAlETb/4p2huAA3Tjie+7ae36eh1yK/9p4b38W/st4PPQBcKfWG0Mlmzha3ny0JLb5K1 5zxblyoBjNzrF/EcF/VPpx0bMeM67Iy+cn3Fs= Received: by 10.101.82.13 with SMTP id j13mr3837979anl.73.1314631167134; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:19:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:18:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qLzNehSRgWD-gAZQ0723xFaVEPY Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:39 -0000 On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>> right? >>> >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >> >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >> >> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >> before displaying the copyright banner). > > Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. > Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. If it did, to what should I set it? > You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. I'll take some photos of the screen.