Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:47:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Michael A. Smith" <msmith@code-fu.com> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 500au Message-ID: <20010514124701.A2926@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010514151609.00a6dc48@www.maiatech.com>; from msmith@code-fu.com on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:24:21PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105131201020.2835-100000@local.localhost> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105140936330.8478-100000@nikita.fi.infn.it> <5.0.2.1.2.20010514151609.00a6dc48@www.maiatech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:24:21PM +0100, Michael A. Smith wrote: > The "a" models (433a, 500a, 600a) are a tiny bit different from the "au" > models. They have Adaptec SCSI boards (from which you cannot boot via SRM) > PLUS the motherboard layouts are a bit different. They *are* physically > different machines. That is NOT true. EVERY `a' model I've seen has a Qlogic 1040 SCSI controller in it. I am willing to bet someone replaced it with the Adaptec controller you have. The motherboard layouts are the same. What do you think is different about them? Or are you comparing the MX5 models with the GL models? I do know that the `a' models have ATAPI CDROM drives vs. the SCSI ones of the `au' models. I believe there are also video differences between the two models. Every Miata I have bought for FreeBSD development (5) + the DEC loaners are `a' modules and all run FreeBSD fine w/o hardware changes once the firmware was updated and switched to SRM. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010514124701.A2926>