Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 17:48:34 -0400 From: Coranth Gryphon <gryphon@healer.com> To: owensc@enc.edu, terry@lambert.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com Subject: Re: smfs Message-ID: <199509132148.RAA02844@healer.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Sep 1995, Terry Lambert wrote:
> You know that the smbfs "logs in" as a single client into an SMB server
> (possibly smbd on another box) and thus has only a single credential
> authenticated, that credential to be used by all UNIX users the kernel
> funnels through the file system, right?
From: Charles Owens <owensc@enc.edu>:
>the regular samba package, and I simply assumed that a kernal-based
>solution would be more effecient than it (memory-usage-wise). Apparently,
>though, smfs, is NOT a functional replacement for samba. I stand corrected.
"smbfs" is the counterpart to samba. The latter allows PC's to use
unix drives. The former allows Unix systems to read PC Drives.
Since PC's do not normally implement user-level security, such cannot
be reasolable implemented without maintaining all the security information
on the unix side of the transaction.
On the other hand, a lot of people are interested in an SMBFS port,
so don't let the fact that it is not what you thought it was stop you :-)
-coranth
------------------------------------------+------------------------+
Coranth Gryphon <gryphon@healer.com> | "Faith Manages." |
| - Satai Delenn |
Phone: 603-598-3440 Fax: 603-598-3430 +------------------------+
USMail: 11 Carver St, Nashua, NH 03060
Disclaimer: All these words are yours, except Europa...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509132148.RAA02844>