Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:13:00 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Message-ID: <20120728231300.GA20741@server.rulingia.com> Resent-Message-ID: <20120812230437.GQ20453@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <501460BB.30806@missouri.edu> References: <20120717232740.GA95026@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120718001337.GA87817@server.rulingia.com> <20120718123627.D1575@besplex.bde.org> <20120722121219.GC73662@server.rulingia.com> <500DAD41.5030104@missouri.edu> <20120724113214.G934@besplex.bde.org> <501204AD.30605@missouri.edu> <20120727032611.GB25690@server.rulingia.com> <20120728125824.GA26553@server.rulingia.com> <501460BB.30806@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2012-Jul-28 16:59:23 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.e=
du> wrote:
>On 07/28/2012 07:58 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Whilst I was debugging the code, I found the following elisp useful
>> for post-processing the output:
>>
>> (progn (downcase-region (point-min) (point-max))
>> (repl-regexp "^ [ ]c" "..c")
>> (repl-regexp "^ c" ".c")
=2E..
Oops, I forgot that repl-regexp is one of my private functions:
(defun repl-regexp (from to)
"Replace every occurrence of regexp FROM with TO in current buffer."
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (search-forward-regexp from nil t)
(replace-match to nil nil)))
Note that it's safe to execute that progn in the buffer contaning ctest
output.
>It is a really nice program.
Thanks.
>I forgot - does it check the fenv settings as well? It would be great=20
>if it does.
Not yet. That's my next task. I've also been thinking about how to do
better than cpow(x,y) =3D cexp(y*clog(x)).
--=20
Peter Jeremy
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlAUcfwACgkQ/opHv/APuIfZAQCgmtyP3h43SfeM4pXZdDZy0fmH
ytkAn2GBeNDh403HQ2ggOe6IQFkhM23E
=hsx+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120728231300.GA20741>