From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:06:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA188106566C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward1.mail.yandex.net (forward1.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:602::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A178FC08 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.mail.yandex.net (smtp1.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.101]) by forward1.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 73C6C1240D28; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:06:42 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326143202; bh=nl0brS1asxLIRNZkJiYyFeL+XDhSdcJN2329IwtO7aY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ds0i5CShq6hvogwOi/43g11s7YFa8yBnnO5AM98X8SkWkrngEl+CnAH3R7PmQiKg5 YMx6x2cFHBvKJqwe9RXAswDjdlU81SG38jvqd2Tg1ZoZY2bqMYnJUkWAI1JASDk7D7 oI2ccReb3Lp8TADjKU7YU/36EHtGb24OXmrRRMwY= Received: from smtp1.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4E200AA0307; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:06:42 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1326143202; bh=nl0brS1asxLIRNZkJiYyFeL+XDhSdcJN2329IwtO7aY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ds0i5CShq6hvogwOi/43g11s7YFa8yBnnO5AM98X8SkWkrngEl+CnAH3R7PmQiKg5 YMx6x2cFHBvKJqwe9RXAswDjdlU81SG38jvqd2Tg1ZoZY2bqMYnJUkWAI1JASDk7D7 oI2ccReb3Lp8TADjKU7YU/36EHtGb24OXmrRRMwY= Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp1.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 6fumtkwd-6fua3sIf; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:06:42 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4F0B56BC.6080601@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:06:04 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F0B4E5F.8040802@secnap.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0B4E5F.8040802@secnap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/zip in 9.x: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:06:43 -0000 Michael Scheidell wrote on 10.01.2012 00:30: > I think I saw something in the list that FreeBSD 9.x has zip already > built in? so, ports that need 'zip' won't need zip? > > for maintainers, they should use something like: > > USE_ZIP= yes > > to: > > if ${OSVERSION} <= 900000 > USE_ZIP= yes > .endif > > and/or BUILD_DEPENDS+= zip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/zip > > (at what OSVERSION was zip included in the base?) > > unzip, not zip. I believe it should be handled in bsd.port.mk like it done for USE_XZ. Something like: .if defined(USE_ZIP) && ${OSVERSION} < 900000 EXTRACT_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip .endif Correct OSVERSION should be used instead of 900000. There is also should be some logic for UNZIP_CMD. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.