From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jun  2 11:31:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA02733
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 11:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay-2.mail.demon.net (disperse.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.77])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA02722
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 11:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-2.mail.demon.net
          id ad14365; 2 Jun 96 19:30 +0100
Received: from an158.du.pipex.com ([193.130.253.158]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net
          id aa00245; 2 Jun 96 19:26 +0100
Received: (from fhackers@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.7.5/8.6.12) id PAA00238; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 15:22:04 GMT
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 15:22:04 GMT
Message-Id: <199606021522.PAA00238@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
From: James Raynard <fhackers@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
To: ache@astral.msk.su
CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199606020344.HAA00370@astral.msk.su> (ache@astral.msk.su)
Subject: Re: Two queries (libcompat.so and timedef())
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> > 2. timedef(). We have colldef() for LC_COLLATE and mklocale() for
> >    LC_LOCALE, but apparently nothing for LC_TIME. However, there seems to
> >    have been a colltime() at one time which was removed about 6 months
> >    ago. What would be involved in writing one?
> 
> Please, don't point to programs as to functions, it can be confusing...

Sorry, I seem to have been a bit muddled when I posted that - and I
meant to say timedef, not colldef. 8-(

> What we have right now:
> 
> LC_CTYPE -> mklocale
> LC_COLLATE -> colldef
> LC_TIME -> timedef (/usr/src/share/timedef)

OK, thanks, I'll pass that on to the person who was asking.