From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 3 09:20:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E0D3E0 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7808C8FC0A for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA39K1X8047221 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA39K1aA047220; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211030920.qA39K1aA047220@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Chris Rees Subject: Re: docs/173321: ports(7) man page -- no info on building with debugging info X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Rees List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/173321; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: "bug-followup@freebsd.org" Cc: Subject: Re: docs/173321: ports(7) man page -- no info on building with debugging info Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:12:12 +0000 I think that we should just make the manpage a stub pointing to (in /usr/ports) README, Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk and the comments in bsd.port.mk. The ports tree evolves so quickly that any man page written for it will immediately be out of date and incorrect. Anyone else agree? Chris