From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 10 19:29:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1842BDDAF20 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tetrosalame@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2FC6E8F1 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tetrosalame@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f21so6338976wrf.5 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:29:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0DXOLDeKXX4EiS73FBw4+05NW/cDwsmJy5hzBqU20IE=; b=GxvTpDkVKL0UOSm5I+ky2Z2u9PAm26YzzYtOJx/2cSYTwJ3O8mPFJ2daN7pNzpYh3s 85+afeNDlFjmUCMTgcBCJcioTYqnx7GMHCye5pJBSFdXe2uR/jJPEkJ9kK0vspeI/y9b AOozyyQIarPH+hmEMEuPbLPpVu+AkUDRSjeyjZFIE1qgTsmU1JpKO1ES1283Q0HQv9G6 SHBBV6UoleEklhGf0FfctnSeM6GLEYwVSbPm0P9qTC6k7FOH5dlf7NPoO9yVDaluz7hc AJeJybvZbd1OWR3/i7OI9yb5dmzjnkKnJnDqyFHGi59/q6yswLkJZjssWX+o2i5P+Bdr JgNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0DXOLDeKXX4EiS73FBw4+05NW/cDwsmJy5hzBqU20IE=; b=LQr2Nqo2tLsfY5r5PdDl4+t2IOQHN20azQyo7RLE7Kfy0KTAdYYtJaNhXLb/RCwJ4/ ef5UQCjRrSn/LcyWlFDgV/EKjboJddFbKJeR2M+wr3+tJjlhBYAnw98Kj0SIR+qRr1r8 S7eABur4UG1LXgVftl9WDngnLvhIusObtKz4Kkjc/zwl/AQBqXaAyHNQ/Czv8XyPqMXO MSgVTjReCaM8F2TPT9vUv/+tAIIvpB/xVxAT1z6Tb21ghW5Ckr7aSEzA/x1bstYG6jiU Kwnk9EfJsfJIJevdiRRigEI49ujdgJ28fvVckPdJst5byz641L19gR1k7TmxF9sjhqTs +8QA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h5bW6JRk/8KYI+nA1aB/ECvizeyVvHYZLO6gfU1/S5s7m3kDu4 Ko7KaI+Cxs3afEY96uE= X-Received: by 10.223.179.71 with SMTP id k7mr10002803wrd.232.1502393355684; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avalon.thwn (host17-71-dynamic.2-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [87.2.71.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l81sm5202394wmf.26.2017.08.10.12.29.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avalon.thwn (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avalon.thwn (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5824496a for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:29:12 +0200 From: fml To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail seperate mta/msa processes Message-ID: <20170810192912.GB9482@avalon.thwn> References: <20170806152213.GB29094@FreeBSD> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170806152213.GB29094@FreeBSD> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:29:18 -0000 On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:22:13AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > Currently my mail server is working well enough. However, I would like to try setting up multiple sendmail processses with their own configurations. So I can have one running on port 25 with spam milters, no relays allowed, and deliver mail to dovecot lmtp. Then have a seperate process with its own config running on port 587 that requires tls+auth before it relays. > > Is this something people do regularly and is easy to implement? Or is it one of those things that after I begin I will wish I had never attempted. > If you do not need milter interfaces, OpenSMTPD is worth a try (it's in ports). It supports mail filters but, as far as I know, they aren't milter-compatible. Or just go with Postfix as you've been told to. I think that if today you stick with sendmail you: a) know why you *need* sendmail OR b) have some legacy software bound to sendmail OR c) just play "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" game (like me). Bye, f.