From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 07:46:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9646106566B for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DC38FC08 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so681809qyk.13 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PFEKQ/FWZ6HSYzkFqGAntY7nc9LXsJcVEQZLmMy6Bqw=; b=H1d02ND/rLMHc4/Hm1eiW120dzXm3zuDoA2+j0UstUqSLwmMEbWz5yZtn87kuOMHpy nyJbJt4M0lOFrEPJD0X1fD3BThlziC8zAq/JtgC/kpqEr++DUg/2J6BA7+XcTEBBzwOF v8RL/JWX+UTj15rcdVV/73TJMhUlqyOtPCl6M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.47.18 with SMTP id l18mr7957965qcf.55.1311234408491; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.219.19 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:46:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E276D00.1060708@gmail.com> References: <4E276D00.1060708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:46:48 +0400 Message-ID: From: Subbsd To: Glen Barber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-jail Subject: Re: ip settings not work for jail 'service' type X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:46:50 -0000 Hi On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Glen Barber wrote: > You are pointing the jail's root directory to the host's root directory. > > Please see the following Handbook chapter: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-build.html > Thanks, i use this non-standard configuration for split services (run multiple process with difference configuration), no for security reason. > Regards, > > -- > Glen Barber >