Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:00:20 -0800
From:      John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org>
To:        Michael Osipov <michaelo@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,  dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Re: git: ece1cb52e7ff - main - security/sssd: mark port deprecated
Message-ID:  <cy3g5xomwle67x3h2spzd67hzjweojiubw5op3ka2h5szwoz5c@t4sbqefurn6c>
In-Reply-To: <a7ee24f4-2ba3-4bb4-a306-0ed89728ab8a@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202402030553.4135rFLH050086@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CALH631kLSy5rBFtXsUbDeXUQ-8P3oWZ6pkN6Tz%2BTwinnifNd6w@mail.gmail.com> <a7ee24f4-2ba3-4bb4-a306-0ed89728ab8a@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--pllxqk7473fvjtux
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Michael Osipov wrote:
> On 2024-02-03 07:25, Gleb Popov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:53=E2=80=AFAM John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org=
> wrote:
> > >=20
> > > The branch main has been updated by jhixson:
> > >=20
> > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=3Dece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c=
8ed659c5974ef1c0088d
> > >=20
> > > commit ece1cb52e7ffa225bc1c8ed659c5974ef1c0088d
> > > Author:     John Hixson <jhixson@FreeBSD.org>
> > > AuthorDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000
> > > Commit:     John Hixson <jhixson@FreeBSD.org>
> > > CommitDate: 2024-02-03 05:51:53 +0000
> > >=20
> > >      security/sssd: mark port deprecated
> > >=20
> > >      - Very old version of this port no longer supported
> > >      - sssd-devel has current versions
> >=20
> > Why not just update this port to the devel version?
>=20
> I agree with Gleb. This is unnecessarily confusing and many will likely
> refuse to use a -devel port in production. Other ports do have regular po=
rts
> and real -devel ports as well. For me, this violates POLA somewhat.
>=20
> M

What is the proper route to take here? sssd-devel isn't really a "devel"
port. It's just the up to date version of sssd. The current sssd port is
very old (like 5 years or more). I would like to just replace it with
the new version but don't want to force an update for anyone who may
rely on it. Should sssd-devel be renamed sssd2 and sssd be renamed sssd1
or some such? What is this POLA that I am possibly violating by the way?

Thanks,

- John

--pllxqk7473fvjtux
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=A8PI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pllxqk7473fvjtux--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cy3g5xomwle67x3h2spzd67hzjweojiubw5op3ka2h5szwoz5c>