From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 08:29:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA7A16A420 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:29:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from espresso2.syncrontech.com (sync-old.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B2343D55 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:29:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from guinness.syncrontech.com (guinness.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.57]) by espresso2.syncrontech.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0H8TRIN083166 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:29:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from [192.168.5.102] (coffee.syncrontech.com [192.168.5.102]) by guinness.syncrontech.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0H8TQQ9060954 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:29:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <43CCAAE2.2040800@suutari.iki.fi> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:29:22 +0200 From: Ari Suutari User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <42F871B4.6000703@freebsd.org> <200601161324.57292.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <43CB8E90.8090902@suutari.iki.fi> <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local> In-Reply-To: <20060116175526.GA25023@lizzy.catnook.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Portsnap is now in the base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:29:33 -0000 Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:16:16PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: >>> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:04, Colin Percival wrote: >>>> About 12 hours ago I committed portsnap to HEAD. From the commit log: >>>> >>>> Add portsnap to the base system. This is a secure, easy to use, >>>> fast, lightweight, and generally good way for users to keep their >>>> ports trees up to date. >>>> >> Is there an utility (cvsup-replacement) like this for base system sources ? > > See csup: http://mu.org/~mux/csup.html. But it's not ready yet. > But isn't this just a clone of cvsup written in C ? I was mostly after security mentioned with portsnap (using openssl to sign updates sounds good to me). I usually use one of cvsup mirrors and have sometimes been thinking what would happen if someone puts some kind of eval code to cvsup mirror's base system code... Ari S.