From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 1 19:21:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7383216A401 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1384613C494 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15862 invoked by uid 399); 1 Feb 2007 19:21:15 -0000 Received: from pool-71-160-74-191.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@71.160.74.191) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 19:21:15 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 71.160.74.191 Message-ID: <45C23DAA.9040108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:21:14 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Marlatt References: <001601c74428$ff9d54b0$ab76ed54@odipw> <45BEE27D.1050804@FreeBSD.org> <45BFA1B3.9040000@rxsec.com> In-Reply-To: <45BFA1B3.9040000@rxsec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:21:16 -0000 Chris Marlatt wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> >> plan to MFC it after 4 or 5 days. I am actually considering only >> MFC'ing it to RELENG_6 to help provide some incentive for those on 5.x >> to upgrade. >> > > One would assume that the release would be supported up until the EOL > provided on freebsd.org of May 31, 2008. Yes, but whether a full upgrade is needed for "support" or not depends on your definition. Given that FreeBSD is not vulnerable to these issues in its default configuration, one could easily argue that an upgrade for RELENG_5 isn't necessary. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection