From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 5 1: 5:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shark.harmonic.co.il (jupiter.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB22A37B6A8 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 01:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (roman@localhost) by shark.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26983; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:05:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:05:00 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon To: Marius Cc: Garance A Drosihn , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Marius wrote: > > I havn't quite gotten around to rebuilding thttpd as people kindly > suggested. Actually, the port of thttpd is an older version of thttpd then We > are running, so it is not just a matter of rebuilding a port. And > secondly, it is a highly customized version of thttpd, patched in several > places to work better with out local setup. It is not a trivial matter, > but I guess that _is_ what I will have to try next. I have been putting > it off. > > Thank you for the suggestions folks. I'll try to report back when I make > some progress for interested parties. (other thttpd users etc.) I aggree that the problem must be fixed (if it exists). But, in your specific situation, in production environment, why not stay with RELENG_3 ? Are you missing some features (since most bugfixes get MFS4'ed)? You can try using some tools like vmstat in order to undertand where's the bottleneck and why... --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message