Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com Cc: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, scrappy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: qt versions Message-ID: <199808091922.MAA01997@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas, What do you want to do with this? Satoshi ------- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT) To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com CC: andreas@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, scrappy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qt and mico-latest From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) * > (3) Delete all but one of the qt's. * * Would be easiest solution. How about backward compatibility ? I don't know. You tell me. :) * You wanted me to do so because of the TCL/TK version mess ! * And I agreed. But possibly we have more luck with qt in terms of * backward compatibility. Did I tell you? Well sorry about that. I should have made it clear how to do it (and shlib version numbers, even MAJOR version number changes, is not the way to do it). * We should ask in ports if nobody objects nuking the other qt libs. Which one do you think we should unify on? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808091922.MAA01997>