Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:54:04 -0400
From:      NetAdmin <daemon@foxchat.net>
To:        JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: The release of 5.3
Message-ID:  <1098042844.30097.8.camel@foxdaemon.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE2BFBAA80DD874BB737A4E2C53AA44903B0191B@CG69UBD01>
References:  <CE2BFBAA80DD874BB737A4E2C53AA44903B0191B@CG69UBD01>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-q0FGBZcGqAc0rpmiPDlK
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Saw the mention of "em nics" and wanted to double check for my own
piece of mind...  I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-I P4 3.06GHz 1U
with Dual Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet that I'm waiting to put 5.3
Release on. =20
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET shows -
Gigabit Ethernet NICs based on the Intel 82542 and 82543 controller
chips (gx(4) and em(4) drivers), plus NICs supported by the Intel
82540EM, 82544, 82545EM, and 82546EB controller chips (em(4) driver
only)
    Can I safely presume (without getting flamed) that my nic's will be
supported?

Regards


--=20
NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network.
The FoxSurfer Group

--=-q0FGBZcGqAc0rpmiPDlK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBcs3cNirmlL8R/7sRAnbbAKCgqYV+/5VrjgPYSfwQqnsg5TkWqACcCqtz
kAphjr0e/8aRDLs1WkQ0HFU=
=UwJF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-q0FGBZcGqAc0rpmiPDlK--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1098042844.30097.8.camel>