From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 7 1:22:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4802137B71B; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA29875; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:22:18 +1100 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:22:09 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Maxim Sobolev , Warner Losh , igorr@crosswinds.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Correct size of kinfo_proc In-Reply-To: <9377.983896057@critter> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <3AA50F01.6560C34A@FreeBSD.org>, Maxim Sobolev writes: > >Well, we are now well informed about this, could we just fix sys/sys/use= r.h to match > >relity (credit goes to phk for broking it and ignoring my posts complete= ly)? >=20 > I've been kind of waiting for -current to actually work again. I hate > commiting to -current when it's b=F6rked. >=20 > Yes, fix it in for now, or better, do the right thing ^^^^^ wrong > with version numbers. Version numbers would be essentially a regression to the way of doing things before Kirk's changes. The size of the struct used to work almost perfectly as a version number in practice, because changes almost always bloat things. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message