From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 11 18:29:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C6416A4DE for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zope@2012.vi) Received: from efit.xs4all.nl (efit.xs4all.nl [82.92.236.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27F243D53 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zope@2012.vi) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (dpc67143135132.direcpc.com [67.143.135.132]) by efit.xs4all.nl (Weasel v1.73); 11 Aug 2006 20:26:15 Message-ID: <44DCCC8E.6010607@2012.vi> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:29:34 -0400 From: beno User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Hennessy , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001801c6bd1e$c5fd7af0$0a00a8c0@thebeast> In-Reply-To: <001801c6bd1e$c5fd7af0$0a00a8c0@thebeast> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Spoofers, Spammers & Other Bad Guys X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:29:48 -0000 Greg, I meant give me an example of the below. I don't know how the confusion occurred on the other LOL! TIA, beno Greg Hennessy wrote: > Killing incoming 25/tcp from cidr blocks assigned to various parts of APNIC > and other registries. Much easier and far less hassle than blocking > individual addresses. > Could you give an example of this? TIA. beno