From nobody Thu Jun 19 12:22:28 2025 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bNKVt0Fdsz5yclZ for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bNKVs67JXz43r2 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1750335749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zOkwKRXBetkXH+G8MkLUW1nzNKjklnzLOXkRY7kiVvo=; b=Qwr8GqsBUHJiTjj+iNuUdqDaZzjMInu9wj+YoeoqsBRLcbn57pbwJB+CBrvxzBVO7lX2pR DDP1bfEEywgr0M7nbiH/ertUgmt1jhxjdNLDsc1C8CfIc7Bbj93JMBMvTU+Y9YeG7RPxTN Oq348tnTvdnI0mPDo6T3M5YJkVKs9YZznq4CpnTpDn4bwLvDs3sAq5hrjv4g8oRrcjQa8w IZmoTBMWYWJtYVzJS2FEVqTat29kGGLPfTsHoD9T8tsrsmsKiPGPaSTxYmI2mj2gfO39fC XZvDOY3TJt2Uj/i2iOrJWmlX3fANi8DxlGA8hGI1AtQHZLYp6xI9a6kRXfqdAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1750335749; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zOkwKRXBetkXH+G8MkLUW1nzNKjklnzLOXkRY7kiVvo=; b=pquK88zuSZd56lAraMLNeCsMZbJNqGMc6xdVyJQd3b3cXHY+wsY5gcXKGspDZFVzuX13Eb hL9iB7H4KmzkHw1ZXzUrX3k3bBuPtO+0PuVvh1IEzfcglxeuBAygpRceEK0HJrGOvc0/HW xsoEqcyEwkWbk9MwhxXEpJ90EkbjbYQ0/mzE7kwTuHWBAye02OuttmBzEryauUHb8OTAO3 D30KrL46FfXr/pmNj5d8HhzvBonZ0cfqUmH830E9Xj4E+Q82fdhS0y5xO15u48N96A1GP1 BFDz3CIAfNFcQpwMy9oprQiFp/S9pmfG2ALYrS1y5tRCjLQqzlZV5YGNAFI65w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1750335749; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=C6anUKhGDRiIq9e/3ssCmSjmglXiOMRp2LCpdLgPBD6lxUK/Qlu44tZerkwgA+z/aKppJz H9nguHDQ0yzMvag0rLqG4/oDwYPU4zBRCegR+1wHwPjSwajGHX301qZb7enM3pas7n1qqq /EnF8tZB3JimnP1GF61HX5IT33uQInsmligkdjIQTHxR6K+p4oCWs6mpkyXMHYwDUuRESb Ap1vkTbUv/ySMti3TjhpC83JsG23qQoUkgBbeaQHh5wMnmVXvZoF64MCc+o2JmrbYyM4vb o6OO5r64/aJEPIFUya3I9yieOVDaX/2LsmreQGPIKQNvDw7HdMJv4qr3n7zFTQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bNKVs5kh9z1DPp for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 55JCMT4Y079031 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 55JCMTQB079029 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 287229] IP reassembly issue in FreeBSD 14.1 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:22:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: olivier@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D287229 --- Comment #17 from Olivier Cochard --- (In reply to Lucas Aubard from comment #15) Using multiple VMs on a lab, then having to reduce the amount of available = RAM to a level not commonly found in today's real hardware is indeed a common pitfall that many have encountered before. However, I have reviewed what is currently available on the market: - Raspberry Pi current version (5) come with 2GB RAM; - The smallest AWS EC2 instances have 4GB RAM; - But on Google and Microsoft Azure we can have 1GB RAM instance; Thus, this reassembly issue is expected behavior in low-RAM scenarios, but = how critical is it? (This is a question for Lucas.) I mean, is it worth adding a warning message if net.inet.ip.maxfragbucketsi= ze is configured to 1, or do we need to find a more complex solution?" --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=