From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 16:31:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:31:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ip193-230.digitalrealm.net [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B1243D41 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:31:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@tvog.net) Received: from adsl-68-72-248-38.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.72.248.38] helo=tvog.net) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DGJc4-0006yo-FF; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:30:44 -0500 Message-ID: <424982E2.4050802@tvog.net> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:31:30 -0500 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Smith References: <1112109734.19982.46.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <1112109734.19982.46.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tvog.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:31:35 -0000 The load for cvsup13.us is pretty low. I am averaging only about 5 or so users. I can probably take on another top level host on the same system. Its a Dual 1.8Ghz Xeon with 2G of RAM, and Ultra160 SCSI disks w/ RAID5. So its plenty beefy enough to handle it. Let me know if you are interested. __________________________________________________ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: laszlof@tvog.net WWW: http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584 Ken Smith wrote: >On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 13:47 -0800, John Polstra wrote: > > > >>The fix for the bug is in the cvsupd server. Lots of people >>would appreciate it if you'd upgrade your cvsup installation to >>"cvsup-16.1h_2" (or the cvsup-without-gui port with the same >>revision). >> >> > >The three machines I more or less watch over: > > cvsup{5,8,18}.freebsd.org/cvsup{9,18}.us.freebsd.org > cvsup9.freebsd.org > cvsup10.{us.}freebsd.org > >should be all set. I'll do cvsup-master some time soon, given its >clients this bug shouldn't be biting any of them (mostly just mirror >sites). > >That first one on the list could still use a little help... It's what I >point existing names at when a site disappears on us. Of the names it's >currently supporting we could use: > > 1) Two new sites in the USA to take over cvsup{9,18}.us.freebsd.org > 2) Two sites anywhere in the world to take over > cvsup{8,18}.freebsd.org. > >For (2) we would be looking for already existing sites that have a >large-ish server set up for it but you feel it is currently severely >under-utilized. We would like the servers in the TLD to be established >sites with a good track record, good network connectivity, and capable >of handling a fairly significant load. Based on observing the three >machines I watch over it's best if the machine have 1Gb to 2Gb of RAM >and, if possible, SCSI disks (SCSI disks is less important if it's got >2Gb memory). With that the machine can typically handle 15 to 25 >simultaneous clients and still remain "responsive" (meaning it doesn't >take forever for each client to finish its updates). With less than 1Gb >RAM the servers tend to become *severely* I/O bound. > >If you'd like to volunteer for any of the above let me know. :-) > > >