From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 7 19:18:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D1216A425 for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9D843D6D for ; Sun, 7 May 2006 19:18:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600C1A3C1B; Sun, 7 May 2006 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0ECB85214D; Sun, 7 May 2006 15:18:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:18:16 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Duane Whitty Message-ID: <20060507191816.GA1976@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <445DC132.7060405@greenmeadow.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 19:18:23 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:43:14AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). > when I last built 6-STABLE >=20 > Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with > 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running > both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and > Evolution open, Firefox is running and running well, and I'm > updating the my local copy of the FreeBSD repository. Oh yeah, > I'm also running a DNS server, a Sendmail server, and SAMBA > I can't believe how responsive everything is on this low-end machine > I'm running. Wow! (And this with debugging turned on but no WITNESS > or INVARIANTS turned on) FYI, in my testing ULE is faster under light workloads but quite a lot slower under heavy loads. It's not recommended, but YMMV. Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEXkf4Wry0BWjoQKURAum3AKDvqqMP340HWmVwZGnHkij7Hsu+ZwCdHADi iQY3frYJSt2kncWlONOrwDI= =phkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--