From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Oct 15 14:56:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D225A15ADD; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE6480A; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:56:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 20F8443C0A; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:56:33 -0500 (CDT) To: Bryan Drewery , Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r399326 - in head: . Mk Mk/Uses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:56:33 +0200 From: "John Marino (FreeBSD)" Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org Mail-Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <561FBDD4.30908@FreeBSD.org> References: <201510150736.t9F7acXB092663@repo.freebsd.org> <561FBDD4.30908@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <6ca15e2c5024108b5ab2f2442bbbba6a@secure.marino.st> X-Sender: freebsd.contact@marino.st User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.1 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:56:34 -0000 On 10/15/2015 4:53 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 10/15/15 12:36 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Author: bapt >> Date: Thu Oct 15 07:36:38 2015 >> New Revision: 399326 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/399326 >> >> Log: >> Readd PORTSDIR for now we will only start removing them after 2016Q1 >> is branched >> >> This gives more time for tools to get updated, available in packages >> etc before >> bothering users > > Thank you for this. At least Poudriere has only had support for a > month, > or even a day for a certain case. It's inability to upgrade itself will > be a common issue. Holding off another few months helps a lot IMO. > Please do commit it back at Q1. It's a worthy effort. FWIW this also helps the DragonFly community. I was in the process of scrambling to sync DragonFly poudriere with FreeBSD's latest version because we were stuck at the ports tree prior to the commit until that happened (dports have to pass through poudriere before they get committed to the tree, so it was a total blocker). John