From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 17:03:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542A5106564A for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:03:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (ns1.scsiguy.com [70.89.174.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250028FC15 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Justins-MacBook-Pro.local (207-225-98-3.dia.static.qwest.net [207.225.98.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8DH4u3V042446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:04:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-ID: <4E6F8CDB.7070708@scsiguy.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:03:23 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Bruno References: <4E6E978C.5060608@scsiguy.com> <1315932695.3217.0.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1315932695.3217.0.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (aslan.scsiguy.com [70.89.174.89]); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:04:56 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] Netfront fixes for FreeBSD-head X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:03:28 -0000 On 9/13/11 10:51 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:36 -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I'm planning to ask RE for permission to merge the following netfront >> fixes (listed below) into 9.0/head. Before I do so, I'd appreciate some >> community testing on the proposed patch set (attached). The main areas >> of concern are: >> >> o TSO/LRO and performance >> o Compatibility with NetBSD and other Dom0s that lack sg or TSO/LRO >> support. >> o Compatibility with configurations enabling ioemu on an interface. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > Should these be applied with the suspend/resume enhancements? > > Sean They include the suspend resume fixes for netfront, but you shouldn't need to other patches for this to work. If you have installed those patches, you'll want to start with a "FreeBSD/head" version of netfront.c before applying this patch. -- Justin