Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:28:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Allan Saddi <allan@saddi.com> To: Jim King <jim@jimking.net> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netgraph bridge and Aironet Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0106042318020.96667-100000@ilceille.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <011b01c0ed6c$d01b8810$980b8486@marble>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there, As others have mentioned, this might be related to the promiscuous mode update made a few weeks ago (April 21?). I no longer have the hardware configuration to verify this, but at the time I submitted the patch, I had netgraph bridging working between fxp & an. I did find a strange problem that I couldn't debug: I believe LOCAL_IFACE *has* to be defined as the Aironet interface. Any other way and the Aironet interface would appear to not receive packets... - Allan On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Jim King wrote: > Should netgraph bridging work with Cisco Aironet NICs which use an(4)? It > seems to work bridging an Intel (fxp) and a DEC (de), but trying to bridge > an Intel and an Aironet doesn't seem to work - the remote node on the > Aironet side is able to get a DHCP lease across the bridge, but nothing > after that works. I can see packets coming into the Aironet with tcpdump, > but I don't see them going out on the Intel side. > > I'm using ether.bridge from /usr/share/examples/netgraph, with > BRIDGE_IFACES="an0 fxp0" and LOCAL_IFACE="fxp0" to get setup the bridge. > > Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0106042318020.96667-100000>