From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 24  8:27:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB1737B423
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA95978;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:27:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200104241527.LAA95978@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: vm_mtx
In-Reply-To: <20010423215131.D1790@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010423215131.D1790@fw.wintelcom.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:51:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said:

> You can find the work I've done so far to make a giant vm mutex
> here:

The Mach code we originally inherited was supposed to already by
multiprocessor safe.  Did we manage to eliminate that capability?

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message