From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 21:46:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528D116A4D1; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEC743D2F; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:46:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i62LQlst097309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Jul 2004 00:26:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i62LJa7g004997; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 00:19:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 00:19:36 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20040702211936.GA4962@ip.net.ua> References: <20040630164047.GC86725@ip.net.ua> <20040702162001.GD78489@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040702184443.GB4193@ip.net.ua> <20040702201200.GA3485@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702201200.GA3485@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Query on status of cross-builds X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:46:11 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:12:00PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:20:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > - ia64: internal errors in ld(1) > > >=20 > > > Way, way at the bottom of my task list. > > > Others are certainly free to look into this. > > >=20 > > Marcel sent you a patch that fixes BFD configuration for ia64 > > on 32-bit machines. > >=20 > > > > - sparc64: generates bad assembler in gnu/usr.bin/tar > > >=20 > > > See ia64 responce above. > > >=20 > > sparc64 will probably need the same patch. >=20 > No. It's a compiler bug on sparc64. I think the old binutils just > didn't complain about the invalid instruction. I compared the > output of the native cc and the cross cc and they are different. > Not much, but fataly so. >=20 Yes, I produced that diff as well (by using -save-temps). Unfortunately, I don't know sparc64 assembler at all... But why it worked before BU upgrade? (We didn't have these tinderbox failures.) Does GCC use some of the BU bits internally? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFA5dFoqRfpzJluFF4RAl4jAJ9A4glSwJyjNiEX/oE0xgyi4pIOXACY8KHH tyOTGc6pGa8LnS68eNcfsg== =UJWP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--