From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 14 15:15:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261A816A4D0 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:15:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C636343D58 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:15:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAEFFDSK024533; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:15:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:17:43 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: John Murphy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041114101451.W25127@zoraida.natserv.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Natd/Gateway=yes vs 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:15:15 -0000 On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, John Murphy wrote: > Section 14.9.6.3 /etc/rc.conf Options says: > If you don't have IPFW compiled into your kernel you will need to > load it with the following statement in your /etc/rc.conf: > firewall_enable="YES" I eventually figured it out.. after HOURS of checking around. I did see that section, it also mentions that you need the kernel options if you will be doing NAT. > So I guess that supersedes your "options IPDIVERT" entry. That options is still needed if you will be doing NAT. The problem was that I had seen in /etc/defaults/rc.conf a network_interfaces="automatic" so I thought that 5.X did not need a network_interfaces line. Once I put network_interfaces="fxp0 ed0 lo0" It all worked. An only took me 4 hours to figure it out. :-(