From owner-freebsd-security Wed Feb 3 09:18:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA13484 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:18:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13440; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:17:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA19122; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:17:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA29988; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:17:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:17:47 -0700 Message-Id: <199902031717.KAA29988@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , woodford@cc181716-a.hwrd1.md.home.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <199902022137.NAA07900@hub.freebsd.org> <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > OK, time to raise this topic again. What to people think about > enabling bpfilter by default in GENERIC? > > And before everyone screams "That would not be BSD!" let me just > note that NetBSD and probably OpenBSD (haven't looked) already do > this. I doubt OpenBSD does, since it's a security hole waiting to happen. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message