From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 25 07:49:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037E4BA3437 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E8EF1E17; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i5so143406482wmg.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mz3EU353uETMZD3alUNwVuY2tqZKNnLwyX81nvLnQj4=; b=tka01KEyOgDYa0NfEN6Lu6WbJ2refJ34sXYg9CbYsYL9AWae5Z1tU1rGDSgjU2YpRd iIwNp1pN5bDDPmSAu67QRez7uzuTY/G/Ahmmm1FqW8DAVnMvzvnEVXlT2jcXmZ/v4Q4D +ziQWVXGGVMF4GCWD9sY3r0WGEHWmYIhS+EoWjJ8lW3bizJQuZ+11nk93D/XUTde+s8h 30fVZ82FVXKjV1er3Ba8bXIfqqh62vusCmWgsd1JrDEfUqZiGEc2XUEITPWE1FIKlp5s NJ4XsWXB3jwi93WUzuSal7WaCsBDALDD8U66PQ5zJVLNMmVXMxcBxJXwTfG36Kx+Xe0R 8XLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mz3EU353uETMZD3alUNwVuY2tqZKNnLwyX81nvLnQj4=; b=B5+MlfxweoEKi/fnEQVcjgRCxXjY0RYUVBP76CpJnV+srlQ2a3a/NoTyXqaFM5tcmT 1vLhSqx18SQfBx11DsXWeeI5/wStuHkW5WCtiXVK7Q2sWIGpIMVJv46he3U7294F0L+u MSBYc1y95QQZ4a5WEpQsu8gwnbsS54bEoGhg8kkS2FYsBRGvyhKejj2CsgzrkZ0o1dhw f61Xuw55XIJt2bbt8eu1MK4Oe5DlycC+dEQh7F4C0ivra9I2YrD4R089UXauB6E57OE0 CvoVWcfU1UQFdYPuyBcoSlczNVgC9BY74J+3fRzG3uc2ftH0O1+t75SXfdutuQvX2df8 1JtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvcJFkE3nA/xuWr+jrGSaQWV4PU7InuC7UAeJ2qWMIXrdFuzfgbVoChAVHAujQpyJkOsFn85jZ0mWRxMA== X-Received: by 10.194.148.202 with SMTP id tu10mr13998130wjb.56.1469432976844; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:49:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.216.81 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:49:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1a31ac70-0036-6ed8-6549-8cb05cbea5b3@freebsd.org> References: <1a31ac70-0036-6ed8-6549-8cb05cbea5b3@freebsd.org> From: krad Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:49:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrading 10.3 -> 11 To: Matthew Seaman Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:49:39 -0000 got this working over the weekend and setup my own custom repo for my builds, and tested with a few jails. All went well so far, and this is going to be a much better way to upgrade my low powered kit in the future, rather than mounting the src and obj dirs all over the place from the build box. Thanks for the good work. On 22 July 2016 at 10:43, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 07/22/16 10:10, krad wrote: > > Hi, as 11 is getting closeish to release is there anything special we > need > > to do in order to upgrade from 10 -> 11. I usually use the makeworld > > method, but I heard that in 11 the base os would be packaged in a > different > > way using pkgng. I cant find any hard information on this though, so > > currently is just looks like a normal makeworld type upgrade will work > with > > all the normal caveats. Am I correct in my thinking? > > Assuming you're talking about running 11-STABLE, then yes, a normal > makeworld cycle will get you upgraded to 11.0 -- plus all the extra bits > needed for a major version upgrade, like reinstalling all your ports so > they link against the new shlibs in the updated system. > > If you want to run 11.0-RELEASE, once it comes out, you can use > freebsd-update(8) to upgrade to it. > > Packaged base is coming, but it's not going to be in place for > 11.0-RELEASE. Current plans are it will go live with 11.1-RELEASE, and > there will be detailed instructions on how to manage the 11.0-RELEASE > (freebsd-update) to 11.1-RELEASE (PkgBase) transition at that time. > > If you'ld like to help testing and developing base packages, subscribe > to the freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org mailing list and start by following > the instructions at https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgBase > > At the moment though, all the PkgBase stuff is entirely voluntary -- you > can choose to opt in if you want. There's no expectation that 11.0 > systems will have base system packages registered, and you can manage an > 11.0 system exactly as you have previously been managing earlier system > versions. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > >