From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Nov  1 03:30:52 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id DAA10704
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:30:52 -0800
Received: from apollo.COSC.GOV (root@apollo.COSC.GOV [198.94.103.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA10697
          ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:30:47 -0800
Received: (from vince@localhost) by apollo.COSC.GOV (8.6.12/8.6.9) id DAA17301; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:27:22 -0800
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 03:27:21 -0800 (PST)
From: -Vince- <vince@apollo.COSC.GOV>
To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
cc: julian@ref.tfs.com, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update
In-Reply-To: <199511011012.LAA15613@keltia.freenix.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951101032606.15405Q-100000@apollo.COSC.GOV>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 1 Nov 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote:

> It seems that -Vince- said:
> > 
> > 	So it is really ahead of stable or 2.1 in the code?
> 
> -CURRENT is ahead of 2.1.  2.1 is "just" 2.0.5  with fixes. It has not  the
> latest VM rewrite, the latest PPP, and so on. 
> 
> At some   point after 2.1,  -CURRENT will  probably  become 2.3-CURRENT and
> -STABLE will be 2.2-STABLE to end up with 2.2-RELEASE and so on.

	So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current 
at some point?  and -stable is just really -current before a -release?

Cheers,
-Vince- vince@COSC.GOV - GUS Mailing Lists Admin
UC Berkeley AstroPhysics - Electrical Engineering (Honorary B.S.)
Chabot Observatory & Science Center - Board of Advisors
Running FreeBSD - Real UN*X for Free!
Linda Wong/Vivian Chow/Hacken Lee/Danny Chan Fan Club Mailiing Lists Admin