From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 28 18:16:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A99E737B416 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 44447 invoked by uid 1001); 29 Mar 2002 02:04:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:04:00 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: Eivind Eklund Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hugelatex / teTeX / conflicts between different ports (generic) Message-ID: <20020328210400.A44399@databits.net> References: <20020329004501.A36555@phoenix.dmnshq.net> <20020328185405.B42896@databits.net> <20020329012235.A295@phoenix.dmnshq.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020329012235.A295@phoenix.dmnshq.net>; from eivind@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 01:22:35AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 29/03/02 01:22 +0100 - Eivind Eklund: | I'd think the verification of what is actually installed (including finding | files that are not registered in /var/db/pkg) would make it generally useful | so it should be a port - do you agree? Now that I think about it, yes -- this would be good. Thanks again for your work on this! --pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message