From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 18:07:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C11065670 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 18:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.pkgsrc-box.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F8A8FC1F for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 18:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.pkgsrc-box.org [127.0.0.1]) by www.pkgsrc-box.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332A8E506BE for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A8F416FB6; Mon, 26 May 2008 20:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 20:07:14 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080526180714.GB27297@britannica.bec.de> References: <200805261715.m4QHFZUK070554@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/cpio Makefile bsdcpio.1 cmdline.c config_freebsd.h cpio.c cpio.h cpio_platform.h err.c matching.c matching.h pathmatch.c pathmatch.h src/usr.bin/cpio/test Makefile main.c test.h test_0.c test_basic.c test_format_newc.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 18:07:28 -0000 On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 07:27:17PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > can you please summarize what are the advantages/differences from gnu-cpio? It has a proper man page. It behaves more sane when writing newc archives with hardlinks. It has understandable source code. It is BSD licensed. Joerg