From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 13:36:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A0E16A4D0 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664443D31 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:36:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i23Lafom037719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:36:41 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i23Laf7Z037718; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:36:41 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:36:41 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Stefan Cars Message-ID: <20040303213641.GA37555@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Stefan Cars , Danny Pansters , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40452715.5030304@mindcore.net> <20040303140216.U99563@guldivar.globalwire.se> <200403031453.49069.danny@ricin.com> <20040303160658.GA32905@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040303222612.W39053@guldivar.globalwire.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040303222612.W39053@guldivar.globalwire.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Danny Pansters cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 1 processor vs. 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:36:49 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Stefan Cars wrote: > Okey, but if you would compare RAID-1 on two disks compared to RAID-5 on > three disks then ? What would be the faster ? RAID1 is going to be faster, both reading and writing, but it will take a lot more raw disk space to provide the required usable space. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARk/pdtESqEQa7a0RAqZnAJ4+cx9E+E3lep11+5D06lwosIPltgCgjdJN xBKzkesM80MvxzqLxuW2ZLw= =wj5t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--