From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 01:14:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2741065672; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58178FC0A; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.samsco.home (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1M0j5bs047551; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1DA65887-49B6-446D-AC31-67B149A6C736@samsco.org> References: <20120221155656.Horde.kkqxT5jmRSRPQ7C4wSPK1kA@webmail.leidinger.net> To: Alexander Leidinger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: marius@freebsd.org, gallatin@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, np@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NICs not in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:14:56 -0000 On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, >=20 > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall = not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? > - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? > - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? > - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be in the = i386 GENERIC profile? Scott