From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 6 15:49:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD04B106566B for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jumper99@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BA728FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Oct 2009 15:23:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO wsa096) [91.205.197.96] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 06 Oct 2009 17:23:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #682707 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YIAgd1axYMCWmeSfs+4ondrg8iMLuSUCXV0bYkK Q/c07oz2HGdsKN Message-ID: <49F0693DC96541B4B9D7B61599A12CA4@vpe.de> From: "Helmut Schneider" To: "Nico De Dobbeleer" , References: <6422287.58441254834893591.JavaMail.root@zimbra-store> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:23:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.72 Cc: Subject: Re: freebsd-pf Stealth Modus X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:52 -0000 From: "Nico De Dobbeleer" > I just finished installing FreeBSD 7.x with pf in transparant bridging > mode as the servers behind the firewall need to have an public > ipaddress. Now is everything working fine and the FW is doing his job as > it should be. When I nmap the FW I see the open ports and closed ports. > Is there a way the get the FW running in stealth mode so that isn't > possible anymore with nmap or any other scanning tool to see the open or > closed ports? There is no "stealth". If a service responds to a request the port is "open". If not it's closed. Helmut