From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 06:29:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209F016A41F; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 06:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rea@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru) Received: from rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (rea.mbslab.kiae.ru [144.206.177.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4270B43D49; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 06:29:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rea@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru) Received: from rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4212BC58; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:29:44 +0400 (MSD) Received: by rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 711C8BABE; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:29:43 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:29:42 +0400 From: "Eygene A. Ryabinkin" To: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <20050831062942.GA801@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> References: <20050830125031.GA775@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> <200508302009.aa99975@nowhere.iedowse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508302009.aa99975@nowhere.iedowse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-AV-Checked: Yes! X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:32:16 +0000 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 06:29:47 -0000 As Ian Dowse wrote to me at Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:08:57PM +0100: > The patch in from the email below may help with the wdrain state - > can you see if it makes any difference? > No, it does not make any. Mainly because my USB 2.0 controller is NEC-based (not VIA), so LOSTINTRBUG flag is not set. Anyway, thanks for your help! -- rea