From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 11 18:38:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E86C16A5D8
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net)
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net
	(elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FED243D55
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:38:08 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
	b=qfiRSkj83o3w4xveiC+Tuymb5P4y3XoruVvPXamZBvphw6EZdeP3UkJ1hmi/L9lt;
	h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [71.116.183.182] (helo=Wednesday)
	by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GBbtQ-00012i-Gk
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:38:00 -0400
Message-ID: <0e2701c6bd75$45c48c50$0225a8c0@Wednesday>
From: "jdow" <jdow@earthlink.net>
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <001801c6bd1e$c5fd7af0$0a00a8c0@thebeast>
	<44DCCC8E.6010607@2012.vi>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:37:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b5711201f228507a02da9a2bc548174006c859a80a966c17e7b0748350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 71.116.183.182
Subject: Re: Spoofers, Spammers & Other Bad Guys
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:38:11 -0000

Well, you can do it with firewall rules. You can do it in the MTA.
I'm sure there are other ways to do it as well.

This might be a useful tool for doing this without blocking some of
the good guys in that part of the world, like Oz and NZ.

http://ftp.apnic.net/stats/apnic/delegated-apnic-latest

{o.o}   Joanne.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "beno" <zope@2012.vi>

> Greg, I meant give me an example of the below. I don't know how the 
> confusion occurred on the other LOL!
> TIA,
> beno
> 
> Greg Hennessy wrote:
>> Killing incoming 25/tcp from cidr blocks assigned to various parts of APNIC
>> and other registries. Much easier and far less hassle than blocking
>> individual addresses. 
>>   
> Could you give an example of this?
> TIA.
> beno