From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar  3 04:25:54 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id EAA12080 for current-outgoing; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 04:25:54 -0800
Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com [16.1.0.22]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA12074; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 04:25:51 -0800
Received: from rks32.pcs.dec.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/24Feb95)
	id AA08019; Fri, 3 Mar 95 04:21:04 -0800
Received: by rks32.pcs.dec.com (Smail3.1.27.1 #16)
	id m0rkWLN-0005OqC; Fri, 3 Mar 95 13:20 MEZ
Message-Id: <m0rkWLN-0005OqC@rks32.pcs.dec.com>
To: jkh%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com
Cc: current%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com
In-Reply-To: Message from "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>  of Thu, 02 Mar 95 14:13:02 PST.
Reply-To: gj@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Mach 4 and Lites note available 
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 95 12:20:29 GMT
From: "gj%pcs.dec.com@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com" <garyj@rks32.pcs.dec.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmmm.  I wonder.  What would people think about us putting a copy of
> LITES on the next FreeBSD 2.1 CDROM?  We could include some simple
> usage instructions on what LITES was and explain how to layer it onto
> the FreeBSD 2.1 installation for intrepid Mach explorers, plus we
> could include whatever research papers were relevant.
> 
>Comments?  I assume that this would be legal?

An excellent idea. As to legality, semms to me that Johannes took special
pains to make sure that everything was unencumbered. You might want to
ask him, though.

Gary J.