From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun May 30  0:42:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de (henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de [193.16.112.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 330D614C0B; Sun, 30 May 1999 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de)
Received: from spock.cc.fh-lippe.de([193.16.118.120]) (3210 bytes) 
	by henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de
	via sendmail with P:smtp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp
	(sender: <lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de>) 
	id <m10o0ET-0000BnC@henoch.cc.fh-lippe.de>
	for <asami@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 May 1999 09:42:09 +0200 (MET DST)
	(Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #3 built 1998-Feb-3)
Received: from cc.fh-lippe.de by spock.cc.fh-lippe.de with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m10o0ER-0006zoC; Sun, 30 May 99 09:42 MET DST
Received: from odie.lippe.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cc.fh-lippe.de (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA20083;
	Sun, 30 May 1999 09:22:26 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from lkoeller@odie.lippe.de)
Message-Id: <199905300722.JAA20083@cc.fh-lippe.de>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= <lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de>
To: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>,
	lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/11888 (was Re: ports/11836: Upgrade of grace port ...) 
In-reply-to: sprice's message of Sat, 29 May 1999 22:16:10 -0500.
	     <Pine.OSF.4.10.9905292214570.9752-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> 
X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~<a~$&$fGIkE9,
 Z#ASoDTT`c'^<e2\j?vaa;_VsBAKPw(&{w\d"S&AGJkz{G^*NJtwqVIlh#'Xj+HKe8=LS_J"H0
 +nBW8e!F.S"/C[pW||0^.Sin*LOZKcR$@B&w2)I'BD_An!)ZU~$oqer\q*8h(!V9YB;k(@bp),E
 ~:aN4x.Q/we6{XZ"4t5D^?K}h~
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 09:22:26 +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

----------

In reply to Steve Price who wrote:
 
 > On Sat, 29 May 1999, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
 > 
 > #  * LOCAL_LIBRARIES = -lXbae XmClientLibs -lXpm ...
 > #  * 
 > #  * I think I understand what you were trying to accomplish,
 > #  * but where does the value of XmClientLibs come from, and
 > #  * shouldn't it look like $(XmClientLibs) or something?
 > # 
 > # Handbook anyone? :)
 > 
 > Well I realized where it came from, but I didn't see how
 > it was getting set.  I fixed it by adding a
 > 
 > 	#include <Motif.impl>
 > 
 > in Xbae.tmpl.

With an propper Motif installation, the Motif.tmpl schould be 
included in Imake.tmpl ... hell I need 15 minutes to walk trough the 
imake jungle :-)

It works the following way:

 In site.def I found

 #ifndef TopLevelProject
 # define TopLevelProject       Motif
 #endif

and in Imake.tmpl

 #ifndef ProjectRulesFile
 # define ProjectRulesFile       Concat3(<,TopLevelProject,.rules>)
 #endif
 #include ProjectRulesFile

so Motif.rules is included from Imake.tmpl.

The site.def File is the one delivered with Motif 2.1

The way it works in older Motif releases was a direct include of 
Motif.tmpl and Motif.rules in Imake.tmpl if I remember right. 

The normal way should be that there is no source manipulation like 

include ....

in the Motif applications! All the ports like xmcd, xmmix compiles 
out of the box, even if I didn't use the ports mechanism! 

Regards

Lars
-- 
E-Mail:                                     |  Lars Koeller
  Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.DE              |  UNIX Sysadmin
  lkoeller@cc.fh-lippe.de                     |  Computing Center
PGP-key:                                       |  University of Bielefeld
  http://www.nic.surfnet.nl/pgp/pks-toplev.html |  Germany
----------- FreeBSD, what else? ---- http://www.freebsd.org -------------




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message