From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Sep 3 06:01:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F943CC194 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46MxCr6QQXz3MTL for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: from ppp14-2-110-112.adl-apt-pir-bras32.tpg.internode.on.net (HELO midget.dons.net.au) ([14.2.110.112]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2019 15:30:47 +0930 Received: from midget.dons.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8360a3k050233 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:30:41 +0930 (ACST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x835tLts045151 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:25:21 +0930 (ACST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) X-Authentication-Warning: midget.dons.net.au: mailnull set sender to using -f Received: from [203.31.81.177] ([203.31.81.177]) by ppp14-2-110-112.adl-apt-pir-bras32.tpg.internode.on.net (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id x835tGbw044714; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:25:21 +0930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12 Xorg vs X11SSH-F / AST From: "O'Connor, Daniel" In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:25:15 +0930 Cc: freebsd-stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2EDB82D8-9EC5-4988-AD1C-21305E712E46@dons.net.au> <4dbdbf1e-b823-20e4-8516-55bb9fdfab88@nomadlogic.org> <7AC86383-2C8E-427D-88BD-48B91FE9ECBC@dons.net.au> <2EB91070-54F2-4046-BB5A-86FBE41FFBE1@dons.net.au> <2B354C0E-8F94-412B-B6B5-DCF681DAE5C8@dons.net.au> To: Pete Wright X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (*) No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP, RDNS_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 on 10.0.2.1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46MxCr6QQXz3MTL X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darius@dons.net.au has no SPF policy when checking 150.101.137.131) smtp.mailfrom=darius@dons.net.au X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.47 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.94)[0.936,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dons.net.au]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.137.101.150.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4739, ipnet:150.101.0.0/16, country:AU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(2.03)[ip: (5.61), ipnet: 150.101.0.0/16(3.05), asn: 4739(1.47), country: AU(0.01)] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 06:01:30 -0000 > On 2 Sep 2019, at 16:33, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 1 Sep 2019, at 16:20, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> I modified the driver on the working system to dump the values that = ASTGetDRAMInfo extracts and hard coded them and it works(!) on the = FreeBSD 12 system. Obviously while this works for me it's not a long = term solution :) >=20 > Also it turns out the performance still sucks, ie no better than VESA. > I tried scfb but a) defaults to 1024x768 and b) it wasn't much faster = (if any). >=20 > So, if anyone has any other ideas I'm all ears :( I've filed a PR against the port (240294) although I suspect it's more = likely to be a kernel issue. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum