From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 20 21:55:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639A437BA8C; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:55:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA07143; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:55:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:55:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200002210555.VAA07143@apollo.backplane.com> To: Will Andrews Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing linux_base 6.1 References: <20000220133512.I14682@dragon.nuxi.com> <14945.951083250@zippy.cdrom.com> <20000220170646.J44834@shadow.blackdawn.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 01:47:30PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: :> P.S. /usr/local/etc/shells anyone? :) : :I second this. As there becomes more ports around, this would simplify :the job of ports since we would now modify a ${PREFIX}-based file :instead of /etc/shells. : :-- :Will Andrews :GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- :?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ :G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? I would be opposed to this for security reasons. The last thing I want to see are /usr/local versions of /etc/ files related to security. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message