From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 13 06:52:32 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA01336 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:52:32 -0700 Received: from Relay1.Austria.EU.net (relay1.Austria.EU.net [192.92.138.47]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA01308 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 06:52:27 -0700 From: Marino.Ladavac@aut.alcatel.at Received: from aut.alcatel.at (dnisun.aut.alcatel.at) by Relay1.Austria.EU.net with SMTP id AA03903 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for ); Tue, 13 Jun 1995 15:52:19 +0200 Received: from atuhc16 by aut.alcatel.at (4.1/SMI-4.1/AAA-1.29/main) id AA07855; Tue, 13 Jun 95 15:52:18 +0200 Message-Id: <9506131352.AA07855@atuhc16.aut.alcatel.at> Received: by atuhc16 (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA06736; Tue, 13 Jun 1995 15:52:18 +0200 Subject: Slow networking with SMC Elite Ultra To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Date: Tue, 13 Jun 95 15:52:17 METDST Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi all, first of all, as far as I can tell, everything works okay. But: I have two 486 boxes on the isolated piece of ether. I've set up networking between the boxes, and they see each other and communicate okay, but *very slowly*. The ether cards are SMC Elite Ultra's, 83-something, which used to be recognized as 8216 w/16 kB of RAM at 2.0R times, and are recognized as 8416 w/8 kB at 2.05A. They did work okay on 2.0R! Right now, my NFS read (cat something >/dev/null) runs at approximately 200 kBps, and FTP get is someplace between 200 and 450 kBps. These numbers seem rather low to me (NFS used to be ~670 kBps but FTP only 200-250 kBps, at 2.0R) What am I doing wrong? (sorry about to few details, I have no internet access from home) Thanks, (for all the great work so far, etc :) /Alby