Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:12:37 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bumps on dependency changes (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/freetype2 Makefile) Message-ID: <20010716151237.A22423@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:07:21PM %2B0300 References: <200107121008.f6CA8iN37556@freefall.freebsd.org> <7mg0c05n3h.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3B52CDFB.C125416@FreeBSD.org> <7mae253xxw.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010716134702.C10331@mithrandr.moria.org> <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 2001-07-16 (16:07), Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > > On Mon 2001-07-16 (20:39), Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > > At Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:20:27 +0300, > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > I have already done it several minutes after upgrading freetype2. > > > > > > Ah, sorry. I missed that. > > > > > > BTW, is it reasonable to bump PORTREVISION for that case? > > > > If the dependencies change you _should_ bump PORTREVISION. If you bump > > a library, you _must_ bump PORTREVISION on the dependencies. > > Nope, you shouldn't do it - it would be poinless. Why do you believe this? At least in my world (and PORTREVISION was my baby), you're changing the package contents such that before it would work with the old library and not with the new library and after it will work on the new library, and not with the old library. With the same versioning information. Maybe I just know nothing about upgradeability, but that seems to screw with it. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010716151237.A22423>