From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 13 21:18:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EC916A592 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B358743FBD for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:18:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from ec.rr.com (cpe-024-211-231-149.ec.rr.com [24.211.231.149]) hAE5HxU6001863; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:18:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FB4656B.90301@ec.rr.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:17:31 -0500 From: Jason User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Barner References: <3FB2B2C1.30704@ec.rr.com> <20031112233149.GA691@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> In-Reply-To: <20031112233149.GA691@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: ioctl for my cdrom X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 05:18:04 -0000 Simon Barner wrote: >>When I try to play a music cd in xmms as root >> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ evil!! ;-) > > > >>it says digital aufio >>extraction test failed: inappropriate ioctl for device. Also it says >>device /dev/acd0 ok. Anyone have a solution? >> >> > >You are running a rather recent -CURRENT, aren't you? > >Some deprecated ioctl has been removed, and there is already a PR for this: > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/57198 > >(Use the "Raw PR" at the bottom of the page to save the report to >/usr/ports/multimedia/files/patch-Input::cdaudio::cdaudio.c > >This should work for you (untested) until the PR is committed to the >ports tree. > >Simon > > Ok, and the only reason I was running as root was because my user does not have access to the device. I will change it when I get it working. Thanks